<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “It Is What It Is”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burg.com/2009/10/%e2%80%9cit-is-what-it-is%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burg.com/2009/10/%e2%80%9cit-is-what-it-is%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Bob Burg&#039;s Official Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Burg</title>
		<link>http://www.burg.com/2009/10/%e2%80%9cit-is-what-it-is%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Burg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burg.com/?p=1372#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>Hi Dawn, great points. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dawn, great points. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.burg.com/2009/10/%e2%80%9cit-is-what-it-is%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burg.com/?p=1372#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>&quot;It is what it is&quot; would annoy someone (very much) who was trying to make &quot;it&quot; wrong.  They would be expecting agreement from the other person.  By using this phrase, you are allowing &quot;it&quot; the space to be without making &quot;it&quot; wrong.  It is my experience that people don&#039;t like their complaints to be thwarted in this way and therefore be annoyed!  Tadah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is what it is&#8221; would annoy someone (very much) who was trying to make &#8220;it&#8221; wrong.  They would be expecting agreement from the other person.  By using this phrase, you are allowing &#8220;it&#8221; the space to be without making &#8220;it&#8221; wrong.  It is my experience that people don&#8217;t like their complaints to be thwarted in this way and therefore be annoyed!  Tadah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Burg</title>
		<link>http://www.burg.com/2009/10/%e2%80%9cit-is-what-it-is%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Burg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burg.com/?p=1372#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>Hi Ana,

I think your friend (and you) expressed it about the best way I&#039;ve ever heard.

And, I really don&#039;t think *that* many people interpret it negatively, especially when it&#039;s said within a context or situation that would imply it is a positive rather than a negative. Still, always great to keep in mind. Thanks for sharing with us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ana,</p>
<p>I think your friend (and you) expressed it about the best way I&#8217;ve ever heard.</p>
<p>And, I really don&#8217;t think *that* many people interpret it negatively, especially when it&#8217;s said within a context or situation that would imply it is a positive rather than a negative. Still, always great to keep in mind. Thanks for sharing with us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana</title>
		<link>http://www.burg.com/2009/10/%e2%80%9cit-is-what-it-is%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burg.com/?p=1372#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone.

I remember the 1st time I ever heard this phrase. It was from a co-worker who was trying to express that something just was and that she was accepting it and wasn&#039;t going to dwell on the why or try to change it. I thought it was a brilliantly simple, yet profound statement and I have used it many times since. I was unaware that it is construed negatively by some, but now that I have, I will keep that in mind when I use it. It would be a bummer for someone to interpret my laid-back, accepting nature for a bad attitude.

Kind Regards,

Ana =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone.</p>
<p>I remember the 1st time I ever heard this phrase. It was from a co-worker who was trying to express that something just was and that she was accepting it and wasn&#8217;t going to dwell on the why or try to change it. I thought it was a brilliantly simple, yet profound statement and I have used it many times since. I was unaware that it is construed negatively by some, but now that I have, I will keep that in mind when I use it. It would be a bummer for someone to interpret my laid-back, accepting nature for a bad attitude.</p>
<p>Kind Regards,</p>
<p>Ana =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Burg</title>
		<link>http://www.burg.com/2009/10/%e2%80%9cit-is-what-it-is%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Burg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burg.com/?p=1372#comment-1663</guid>
		<description>Hi Teresa, I like that. I agree in that it really is neutral in it&#039;s basic sense, isn&#039;t it? I think it becomes positive when we respond to the situation appropriately. I like your thought on that. Thank you.

Hi Kirsty, great to hear from you. I have personally never heard others using it in a negative light but, yes, I&#039;m sure it could be interpreted that way. One other person commented the same thing to me. Like you, she had heard someone else using it negatively, so maybe it has something to do with the first time a person hears it. I remember writing an article once a long time ago regarding a method of positive persuasion that was absolutely meant to very kindly make a point, and a person wrote to me with &quot;dissapointment&quot; that I&#039;d use a phrase that is meant to &quot;belittle&quot; someone. Of course, I asked her why she interpreted that way and it turned out she once had a teacher who had used the same words, but in a very condescending way. Many lessons to be learned about how us humans think and interpret, aren&#039;t there? Thank you for sharing. You always add great comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Teresa, I like that. I agree in that it really is neutral in it&#8217;s basic sense, isn&#8217;t it? I think it becomes positive when we respond to the situation appropriately. I like your thought on that. Thank you.</p>
<p>Hi Kirsty, great to hear from you. I have personally never heard others using it in a negative light but, yes, I&#8217;m sure it could be interpreted that way. One other person commented the same thing to me. Like you, she had heard someone else using it negatively, so maybe it has something to do with the first time a person hears it. I remember writing an article once a long time ago regarding a method of positive persuasion that was absolutely meant to very kindly make a point, and a person wrote to me with &#8220;dissapointment&#8221; that I&#8217;d use a phrase that is meant to &#8220;belittle&#8221; someone. Of course, I asked her why she interpreted that way and it turned out she once had a teacher who had used the same words, but in a very condescending way. Many lessons to be learned about how us humans think and interpret, aren&#8217;t there? Thank you for sharing. You always add great comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

